1952 Allard J2R vs. 2004 Isuzu Axiom
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Axiom is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard J2R (251 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Axiom. (212 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard J2R should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Axiom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Axiom weights approximately 904 kg more than 1952 Allard J2R.
Because 2004 Isuzu Axiom is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard J2R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard J2R (508 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Axiom. (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1952 Allard J2R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Axiom.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2R | 2004 Isuzu Axiom | |
| Make | Allard | Isuzu |
| Model | J2R | Axiom |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5415 cc | 3494 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 212 HP |
| Torque | 508 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 1902 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 880 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2710 mm |
