1952 Allard K2 vs. 1992 Toyota Camry
To start off, 1992 Toyota Camry is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Toyota Camry (129 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Toyota Camry weights approximately 345 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1992 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Allard | Toyota |
| Model | K2 | Camry |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2958 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1545 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2630 mm |
