1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe

To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe (283 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1292 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe (481 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 402 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Austin A 40 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe
Make Austin Chevrolet
Model A 40 Tahoe
Year Released 1952 2000
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1199 cc 5964 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 41 HP 283 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 79 Nm 481 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 65.5 mm 102 mm
Engine Stroke Size 89 mm 92 mm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 6 seats
Vehicle Weight 1000 kg 2292 kg
Vehicle Length 4060 mm 5060 mm
Vehicle Width 1610 mm 2010 mm
Vehicle Height 1590 mm 1890 mm
Wheelbase Size 2360 mm 2950 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]