1952 Austin A vs. 2008 Jeep Commander

To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Commander (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1952 Austin A. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A weights approximately 109 kg more than 2008 Jeep Commander.

Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A. (288 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Austin A 2008 Jeep Commander
Make Austin Jeep
Model A Commander
Year Released 1952 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3992 cc 3701 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 124 HP 210 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 288 Nm 319 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1975 kg 1866 kg
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1840 mm
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2790 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 80 L