1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2004 Citroen Xsara
To start off, 2004 Citroen Xsara is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen Xsara (108 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 293 kg more than 2004 Citroen Xsara.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen Xsara. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2004 Citroen Xsara | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Citroen |
Model | Tickford | Xsara |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 184 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1237 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2550 mm |