1952 Austin Princess vs. 1949 Buick 40
To start off, 1952 Austin Princess is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin Princess (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin Princess should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin Princess weights approximately 311 kg more than 1949 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin Princess | 1949 Buick 40 | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | Princess | 40 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 4066 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1956 kg | 1645 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3000 mm |