1952 Bentley R Type Continental vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bentley R Type Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bentley R Type Continental would be higher. At 4,566 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Bentley R Type Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 130 kg more than 1952 Bentley R Type Continental.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Bentley R Type Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Bentley R Type Continental | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Bentley | Chevrolet |
Model | R Type Continental | Equinox |
Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4566 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 180 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1651 kg | 1781 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4771 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2857 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 71 L |