1952 BMW 340 vs. 2010 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Toyota Tundra is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Tundra (276 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 BMW 340 weights approximately 170 kg more than 2010 Toyota Tundra.
Because 2010 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 BMW 340. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 2010 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 340 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3230 mm |