1952 BMW 340 vs. 2011 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2011 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 686 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 BMW 340. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 2011 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 340 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2946 mm |