1952 Cadillac 62 vs. 1974 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1974 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 920 kg more than 1974 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Cadillac 62 | 1974 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | 62 | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5425 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 76 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 955 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2510 mm |
