1952 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 611 kg more than 1952 Cadillac 62.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | 62 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5425 cc | 4394 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 301 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 2486 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3230 mm |