1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2009 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (172 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe.
Because 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2009 Chevrolet HHR | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
| Model | DeLuxe | HHR |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3546 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 172 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |
