1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2010 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2010 Saturn Outlook is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saturn Outlook (281 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe weights approximately 112 kg more than 2010 Saturn Outlook.
Because 2010 Saturn Outlook is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2010 Saturn Outlook | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Saturn |
| Model | DeLuxe | Outlook |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3546 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 281 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 1285 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1990 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 83 L |
