1952 Ford 12 M vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Because 1952 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1952 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1952 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford 12 M | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
| Model | 12 M | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4771 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2857 mm |
