1952 Holden FX vs. 1980 Holden Commodore

To start off, 1980 Holden Commodore is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,838 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Holden Commodore (102 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Holden Commodore weights approximately 250 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Holden Commodore (192 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1980 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Holden FX 1980 Holden Commodore
Make Holden Holden
Model FX Commodore
Year Released 1952 1980
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2166 cc 2838 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 51 HP 102 HP
Torque 136 Nm 192 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 970 kg 1220 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2670 mm