1952 Holden FX vs. 2012 Daihatsu Sirion
To start off, 2012 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Daihatsu Sirion (86 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Daihatsu Sirion should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX.
Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Daihatsu Sirion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Daihatsu Sirion. (121 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Daihatsu Sirion.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 2012 Daihatsu Sirion | |
Make | Holden | Daihatsu |
Model | FX | Sirion |
Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 86 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |