1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1952 Jaguar XK is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom (164 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 565 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Jaguar | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | XK | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 5673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 164 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 114.3 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3690 mm |
