1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1980 Volvo 66 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XK | 66 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1550 mm |