1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1985 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1985 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1985 Mitsubishi Sigma. (94 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1985 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 225 kg more than 1985 Mitsubishi Sigma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mitsubishi Sigma. (152 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
|1952 Jaguar XK||1985 Mitsubishi Sigma|
|Engine Size||3441 cc||1995 cc|
|Engine Cylinders||6 cylinders||4 cylinders|
|Horse Power||158 HP||94 HP|
|Engine RPM||5000 RPM||5600 RPM|
|Torque||290 Nm||152 Nm|
|Torque RPM||2500 RPM||2400 RPM|
|Vehicle Weight||1295 kg||1070 kg|
|Vehicle Length||4430 mm||4460 mm|
|Vehicle Width||1570 mm||1660 mm|
|Vehicle Height||1340 mm||1370 mm|
|Wheelbase Size||2600 mm||2520 mm|