1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1986 Lancia ECV
To start off, 1986 Lancia ECV is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Lancia ECV (600 HP) has 442 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Lancia ECV should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 1986 Lancia ECV is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Lancia ECV will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 1986 Lancia ECV | |
Make | Jaguar | Lancia |
Model | XK | ECV |
Year Released | 1952 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1757 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 600 HP |
Top Speed | 201 km/hour | 233 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |