1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
| Model | XK | F1 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 45 L |
