1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2004 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2004 Mazda B2300 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B2300. (143 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B2300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 148 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B2300. (209 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B2300.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2004 Mazda B2300 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XK | B2300 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 209 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1443 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 74 L |