1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | XK | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 245 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2830 mm |