1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2005 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 605 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (305 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2005 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Jaguar | SsangYong |
Model | XK | Rexton |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2874 cc |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1900 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 80 L |