1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XK | 6 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 201 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 55 L |