1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2012 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2012 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2012 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2012 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Daewoo Tocsa. (237 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Daewoo Tocsa.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 2012 Daewoo Tocsa | |
| Make | Jaguar | Daewoo |
| Model | XK | Tocsa |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2700 mm |
