1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2012 Saab 05-Sep
To start off, 2012 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Saab 05-Sep (187 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Saab 05-Sep should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 2012 Saab 05-Sep is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Saab 05-Sep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 2012 Saab 05-Sep | |
| Make | Jaguar | Saab |
| Model | XK | 05-Sep |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 187 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5009 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1862 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1468 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2837 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |
