1952 Renault Juva vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mini Cooper is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Cooper weights approximately 469 kg more than 1952 Renault Juva.
Because 1952 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Renault Juva | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Renault | Mini |
Model | Juva | Cooper |
Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 1003 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1432 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2547 mm |