1952 Riley RM A vs. 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 865 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Riley RM A | 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Riley | Rolls-Royce |
Model | RM A | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 1952 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3040 mm |