1952 Triumph Renown vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (317 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 290 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (373 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Triumph Renown | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
| Make | Triumph | Cadillac |
| Model | Renown | ATS |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.5 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4643 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1417 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2776 mm |
