1952 Volkswagen Beetle vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Volkswagen Beetle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Volkswagen Beetle would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (83 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1952 Volkswagen Beetle. (24 HP @ 3300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1952 Volkswagen Beetle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 1605 kg more than 1952 Volkswagen Beetle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Volkswagen Beetle | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Volkswagen |
| Model | Beetle | Polo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 1131 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3300 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 702 kg | 2307 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1470 mm |
