1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1980 Volvo 66 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 708 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Volvo |
| Model | Tickford | 66 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 822 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
