1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2006 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2006 Toyota Tundra is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Tundra (236 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Because 2006 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford 12 M | 2006 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | 12 M | Tundra |
Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1171 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 236 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3270 mm |