1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2010 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota 4Runner (157 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 1953 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1953 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford 12 M | 2010 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | 12 M | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1171 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1816 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2789 mm |