1953 Holden FX vs. 1964 Maserati Mistral
To start off, 1964 Maserati Mistral is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,694 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Maserati Mistral is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Maserati Mistral (243 HP) has 192 more horse power than 1953 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 1953 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Maserati Mistral weights approximately 280 kg more than 1953 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Holden FX | 1964 Maserati Mistral | |
Make | Holden | Maserati |
Model | FX | Mistral |
Year Released | 1953 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 3694 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 243 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2410 mm |