1953 Riley RM A vs. 2011 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2011 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1384 kg more than 1953 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1953 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1953 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Riley RM A | 2011 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | Riley | Cadillac |
| Model | RM A | Escalade |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 403 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 2619 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5662 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2009 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1857 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3302 mm |
