1954 Austin A 40 vs. 2009 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2009 Nissan Titan is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Nissan Titan has automatic transmission and 1954 Austin A 40 has manual transmission. 1954 Austin A 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan Titan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 40 | 2009 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 40 | Titan |
Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 5551 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 5710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 106 L |