1954 Buick 40 vs. 1992 Rover 620i
To start off, 1992 Rover 620i is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1992 Rover 620i. (113 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 620i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1992 Rover 620i. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 620i, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (309 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 620i. (172 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 620i.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 1992 Rover 620i | |
Make | Buick | Rover |
Model | 40 | 620i |
Year Released | 1954 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4328 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 309 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1720 mm |