1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 1989 De Tomaso Pantera
To start off, 1989 De Tomaso Pantera is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 De Tomaso Pantera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 De Tomaso Pantera (350 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1954 Cadillac 62. (267 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 De Tomaso Pantera should accelerate faster than 1954 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1954 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1989 De Tomaso Pantera has manual transmission. 1989 De Tomaso Pantera will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1954 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 1989 De Tomaso Pantera | |
Make | Cadillac | De Tomaso |
Model | 62 | Pantera |
Year Released | 1954 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 5766 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 350 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2520 mm |