1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford 12 M | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Ford | Cadillac |
| Model | 12 M | CTS |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1504 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2880 mm |
