1954 Isuzu Minx vs. 2000 Volkswagen Lupo
To start off, 2000 Volkswagen Lupo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volkswagen Lupo (49 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Lupo should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volkswagen Lupo weights approximately 10 kg more than 1954 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Lupo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Isuzu Minx | 2000 Volkswagen Lupo | |
Make | Isuzu | Volkswagen |
Model | Minx | Lupo |
Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 49 HP |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2330 mm |