1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1981 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1981 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1300 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209.
Because 1955 Abarth 209 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 209. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 1955 Abarth 209 has manual transmission. 1955 Abarth 209 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 1981 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 209 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1955 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 6030 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 5620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3090 mm |