1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2009 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (305 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 593 kg more than 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (454 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (191 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2009 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Jeep |
Model | Sports Convertible | Commander |
Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 454 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 2043 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2790 mm |