1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2013 Chrysler 300 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chrysler 300 (358 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1955 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1955 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 48 kg more than 1955 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Chrysler 300 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chrysler 300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | 62 | 300 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 358 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2048 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5044 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 3052 mm |