1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Lincoln MKZ
To start off, 2013 Lincoln MKZ is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lincoln MKZ (296 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1955 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKZ should accelerate faster than 1955 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 260 kg more than 2013 Lincoln MKZ.
Because 2013 Lincoln MKZ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Lincoln MKZ | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
| Model | 62 | MKZ |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5424 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2116 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1478 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2850 mm |
