1955 Ford 12 M vs. 1974 Triumph Stag
To start off, 1974 Triumph Stag is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Triumph Stag (143 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Triumph Stag should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford 12 M | 1974 Triumph Stag | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | 12 M | Stag |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2550 mm |
