1955 Ford Crestline vs. 1984 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1984 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,643 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Crestline weights approximately 550 kg more than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1955 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford Crestline | 1984 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Crestline | Colt |
Year Released | 1955 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3643 cc | 1437 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2390 mm |