1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 2011 Audi Q5
To start off, 2011 Audi Q5 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 2011 Audi Q5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi Q5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 2011 Audi Q5 | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Audi |
| Model | Phantom | Q5 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 211 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3690 mm | 2807 mm |
