1956 AC Ace vs. 1995 Lada Niva
To start off, 1995 Lada Niva is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Ace (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1995 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Niva.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Niva. (130 Nm). This means 1956 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 1995 Lada Niva | |
Make | AC | Lada |
Model | Ace | Niva |
Year Released | 1956 | 1995 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 130 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 80 mm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 42 L |