1956 Aston Martin DB3 vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Aston Martin DB3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Aston Martin DB3 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1956 Aston Martin DB3. (210 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1956 Aston Martin DB3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Aston Martin DB3. (195 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Aston Martin DB3.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Aston Martin DB3 | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Aston Martin | Holden |
Model | DB3 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2920 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 195 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |